Skip to main content

In this exclusive interview with IFMR LEAD, Dr. Sultan Hafeez Rahman, Executive Director of BRAC Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD), Bangladesh discusses the importance of and barriers to evidence based research for policymaking. He also specifically talks about the current research and development scenario in Bangladesh and how regional cooperation can help address key development challenges of collaborating countries.

Drawing on various country experiences, what is your take on the importance of research evidence in the current policymaking environment of low and middle-income countries?

Globalization and sustained technological change has ushered the world in the 'age of knowledge.' It is absolutely imperative for governments to take advantage of the growing body of knowledge (based on rigorous research) and research methods that can be used to solve the complex challenges they face in transforming their countries into more just and prosperous societies. They need to rapidly develop their capacity both to undertake research within their own system as well as draw on the wider academic research and think tank community to inform policy making. Otherwise they will not be able to develop 'smartly' and lag behind in their national development goals. On the positive side, it has to be said that a growing number of countries are beginning to realize the importance or research evidence for policy making.   

What in your opinion is the biggest barrier in supporting policy decisions with research evidence in low and middle-income countries – Demand, supply or research tools? 

I feel the constraints are structural in nature relating to the way in which governments in these countries conduct business and an entrenched mind-set. Government's, more often than not, need to take decisions 'on the fly.' Matters are always 'urgent' because government leaders/politicians must take a host of decisions relating to issues/demands/concessions. They tend to use their own understanding, past practice, advice of senior bureaucrats, follow instructions of higher authority or even their 'instinct' to take decisions. Such ad hoc decision making is not conducive to a considered assessment of evidence based on research in formulating public policy. Second, The government leaders and the bureaucracy tend not to take evidence into consideration (or seriously enough) because it may be at odds with their own views on the content of specific policies; or because they lack the capacity to engage with researchers. This seems to reflect an entrenched mindset which causes 'tension' between political leaders and the bureaucracy on the one hand, and researchers on the other. Government leaders and the bureaucracy often describes the output of research, ie, evidence as being 'theoretical' and hence not quite 'applicable to the practical solutions' they demand. 

How would you suggest addressing the barriers in research and development in Bangladesh?

While the barriers noted above are challenging, there are some politicians in government and senior bureaucrats who understand the relevance and importance of research evidence for policy making. Researchers need to identify these 'champions' and work with them over the 'long haul' to gradually increase their influence and impact. It is also important to recognize that the government are beginning to realize the importance of research in policy making, even though they are hesitant or unable to institute this on a large enough scale across the government.   

How far can regional collaboration, exchange of ideas and learning between countries contribute towards tackling development challenges in low and middle-income countries?  

Regional collaboration in research via exchange of ideas, learning from each others' problems and policy applications/solutions, enhancing the research capacity of academic institutions and think tanks can be a powerful instrument in addressing development challenges of the collaborating countries. This should be viewed as intangible 'capital flows' across two countries; 'captial' in this case would constitute 'human or knowledge capital.' More importantly such collaboration could have more powerful development impacts than investment capital flows, and indeed can also be a good example of 'south-south' cooperation in some cases.   

In your opinion, which are the key partnerships aligned to the Digital Bangladesh Vision 2021 agenda of the government, and how do you see them contributing towards achieving financial inclusion in the country? 

Digital Bangladesh is a major plank of Vision 2021. Bangladesh will celebrate 50 years of independence and has sent itself the goal of becoming an upper middle income country by then. Web based technologies have revolutionised the world in opening up ever new horizons of possibility for countries to transform and develop. I believe that countries like Bangladesh can benefit enormously from such technology solutions. However, its downsides are also all too clear---it can be risky and costly--as the recent hacking of the central Bank's account with with New York Federal Reserve Bank indicates.  Digital Bangladesh is in essence a vision of a 'IT-connected country in which the rural-urban divide in connectivity is eliminated to enable the poor and less developed regions of the country to benefit from smart solutions such us mobile banking, mobile cash transfers for safety nets and other anti-poverty programs, making rural urban migration more efficient and profitable, IT systems based solutions in agriculture, off farm activities, industry and services---and so many other prospects. In a decade's time we will live in an unimaginably technology-enabled world to which virtually the entire population of developing countries would have access. Bangladesh will has already been a pioneer in some of these areas--mobile phones (now 'connected smart' phones) and mobile banking. Key partnerships across countries not only to build capacity on the technical side, but also to undertake research to evaluate the impact of introducing public policies using such technology based solutions will be critical to reaching the targets of Vision 2021 and Digital Bangladesh; domestic partnerships between the wider research community and government research and policy making entities will also be crucial.

Dr. Sultan Hafeez  Rahman is serving as the Executive Director of BRAC Institute of Governance and Development (BIGD), BRAC University. He is also the Country Director of the International Growth Centre's research programme in Bangladesh since 2013.  In June 2012, he retired from the Asian Development Bank as Director General, South Asia. He has served as a member of several high-level government, regional, and international expert panels, task forces and committees. These included the expert panels of 3rd, 4th and 7th Five Year Plans of Bangladesh. In addition, he was Adviser/Consultant to the Ministries of Jute, Industry, Commerce and, Finance and Planning. Dr. Rahman also served as a Director in the Board of Directors of the state owned Agrani Bank from 1988-91 as a nominee of the government. 

Dr. Rahman is a reputed economist and his current research interests are in the areas of economic growth and inequality, macroeconomic policy, governance, regional economic integration and sustainable development. Dr. Rahman obtained his Ph.D. and M.A degrees from Stanford University and Vanderbilt University. He was also educated at University of Dhaka, Chittagong University and Faujdarhat Cadet College.


Popular Posts

Vocationalisation of education in India: Current Scenario, Key Challenges and New directions

“Every handicraft has to be taught not merely mechanically as is done today, but scientifically. This is to say, the child should learn the why and wherefore of every process.” - Gandhi’s Philosophy of Education

The greatest challenge in Indian education system today is to provide skill based education to the youth. This is exacerbated by a mismatch in demand and supply for the skilled workforce. The penetration of vocational education and training remains poor not only in rural areas, but also in urban regions where there is a higher installed capacity to impart the same. This post is an attempt to make the readers understand the need of vocational education in India. Also, this is an attempt to summarise a few recommendations on the same. 
A recent survey (61st round) conducted by the NSSO found that:

1. The percentage of population that completed primary education was 70%, but less than 10% went on to complete a graduation course and above. Almost 97% of individuals in the age bracket…

Rockstar of Financial Inclusion: Business Correspondent Model of India

About Author:  Jatinder Handoo is a social business enthusiast and a branchless banking practitioner. Currently works at FINO PayTech Ltd and is based out of Mumbai. He is reachable at
India is a hot bed of financial exclusion. A country which houses nearly 16% of the global population  has more than 65% of its people outside the formal financial system (Global Findex 2012). The Indian banking system has adopted multiple approaches to make universal financial inclusion a reality right from early days Indian post-independence banking system. Be it bank nationalization in 1969 or formation of Regional Rural Banks. Formation of NABARD or fostering microfinance through Bank-SHG linkage programme in early 90’s. A shimmering ray hope was rekindled with the growth of JLG based microfinance, however later studies made it clear that the model is credit led, concentrated predominately in the southern region of India thus could not be seen as painting complete financial…

A Platform for Knowledge - Enabling people to learn ..

I received a rather interesting link/website via my email today. The link read as MR University and all I could think of was, "Ok, this must be another website portal of some university or college". Well, on clicking the link and looking through the contents of the site, I was pleasantly surprised. The site is an online education portal or platform that allows users or teachers to upload short videos on topics or lessons they wish to impart. First topic that I come across is Development Economics.
The intent of the website is eloquently put out by the two economists, Tyler Cowen and Alex Tabarrok in the intro video. What started as a blog focusing on economics and its various implications in understanding why things are the way they are around us, has now an interesting addition. A video portal titled MRUniversity or Marginal Revolution University that focuses on online education with subjects pertaining to economics. It brought back to my mind,…